Modification sought in reorganisation of?
Author: admin // Category: difficult mathematics problemsMath-section!!!! I draw the attention of young students and opinion of top contributors of math section as to whether there is a need to split the section into 2 parts viz
> mathematics, and
> Applied mathematics
Presently, I think neither the young students are being squarely benefited nor YA able to coordinate affairs of math section properly. There is lot of volume exchange from students and wishful meandering of difficult problems by top contributors. Bulk voting and multiple similar solutions are also problems of concern for young students who get perplexed by TUs/TDs given randomly favorites/foes. Applied math question will engage top contributors interest fully and when free they can help other math section category.
Something similar could be designed for physics section as well.
There are my observations, and you may be having your own set.
Please comment!!
YA staff is invited to opine/clarify
i would even go to the extent of proposing > mathematical physics sub-section
Mr Daftary> it’s not all about TUs/TDs. If your past efforts did go waste with YA then it does not mean that the society will continue to remain curbed as if Hitler continues to rule. We are advancing, and my personal objective is to see something like "mathematical physics" branching out in YA for physics students.
I know logic is absolute, yet for physics, mathematics is only RELATIVE, and benefits cannot be subjected to boundary conditions or limitations of a group/institution (YA).
Scythian1950> Mr Daftary revealed to me that you are too good in math. I respect your knowledge, and will remind myself 10 times before annoying myself to your good self. you views herein are uncompromising to the scale i am asking from.
Try my next quetion please on the same theme, but across boundaries
read above as:
Mind everyone> students are NOT as bad as we top contributors are (not all)!!
read above as:
Mind everyone> students are as bad as we top contributors are (not all)!!
Scythian1950> I have enjoyed most beautful comments from askers in physics, and math as well. But, math is too erratic that too bcause of wrong policies of top contributors!!!
Mind everyone> students are as bad as we top contributors are (not all)!!
write your comments please
Scythian1950> your big brother advice to Rakesh Dubey regarding top contributors is a "sort of red-tape", which speaks volume about a chief warrior trying to square up a JCO (junior commisioned officer).
δoτ > we all agree to the fact that mathematics section is crippled without the facility of text-editor, yet we have devised ways to put across the logical text and equations reasonably well. YA might be having reservations against the editor and its complex symbols that might flood up its system. The problem is not with YA, but with group of sensible people, considering themselves only CONTRIBUTORS – with earned TOP portfolio, who while so intensely competing render the solutions beyond the reach of students. In fact, many math and other questions askers are so sure of multiple voting that they just forget it after asking.
lithiumdeuteride >
The moot point is to keep contributors under a given category, and not the asker’s question. Suppose a TOP-10-contributor (XXX) is busy in applied math then he will have enough suitable material to work with at peace (as Scythian1950 wished) and will not be bothered if question comes therein wrongly, thus lesser mortals (seeking top-10) will contribute to that question. If question is in other math category, then young students will get chance to answer to new askers. I think every asker (so smart these days) is well aware as to where the question should land.
as everyone pointed out that YA is normally under deep SLUMBER on such issues, i take your kind permission to extend the duration of this Qs. Please circulate in your friend circle of members/non-members of YA. Thanks
Thank you Dr D (as also extended to everone else), but the newer ststem will be as true as it seems to you presently. But, a changed mess, whether +vely or -vely, has always brought in progress. Do not worry Scythian1950 could be easily located in an improved mess (applied math) as well.
psbhowmick > very precipitating and honest comments of your goodself. Thanks for stopping and caring herein. Respond to my email to you.
I agree with this opinion that it should be divided with some restrictions in at least three sections 1) Mathematics (day to day life based) 2) Mathematics (academic) 3) Mathematics (applied), but I don’t think that there would be any effect on Y/A system and will take any action about it.
TUs/TDs should be replaced by honest comments (agree with Mr Madhukar.) or if any one gives TU/TD, it should be disclosed. these discussions have been already done but all in vain.
Role of Top contributors here also is not very good (showing off, having multiple profiles, unneccessary comments etc.). Once, I had asked a question and couldn’t select the actual BA, as a result, that answerer got very disappointed (I realised that I made a mistake).I know six - seven top contributors/contributors, who are really highly knowledgeble and I respect them very much and I try to learn from them.
I think that whatever is consistent with right reasoning should be accepted, even though it comes from a boy or even from a parrot; and whatever is inconsistent therewith ought to be rejected, although emanating from an old man or even from the great Mathematician. . .